Update list of lawrememberers and reword the part about what filibusters and not to be clearer
This commit is contained in:
parent
22d50ac44f
commit
0eb2d2199b
1 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
16
lawguide.tex
16
lawguide.tex
|
@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ made by `nick'. \texttt{nick, } can be used instead of \texttt{nick: }.
|
|||
\subsubsection{What counts as a filibuster/proposal?}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Filibustering messages \emph{are} proposals, \emph{unless} they're sent by
|
||||
bots to explain something in the previous message (e.g. title bot, automatic translation)
|
||||
\emph{or} they begin with \texttt{nolog:} or \texttt{[nolog]}.
|
||||
\item Messages \emph{are} proposals, \emph{unless} they're sent by bots to explain something in the
|
||||
previous message (e.g. title bot, automatic translation) \emph{or} they begin with \texttt{nolog:}
|
||||
or \texttt{[nolog]} \emph{or} is like a valid vote but with \texttt{:D:} or \texttt{D:} substituted
|
||||
for \texttt{:D}.
|
||||
\item Bot messages sent as a response to direct command (e.g. program evaluation,
|
||||
non-automatic translation) \emph{are} proposals.
|
||||
\item Bot messages that are generally to be ignored in the legislative process (e.g. title
|
||||
|
@ -131,7 +132,8 @@ to something in channel \emph{or} are disruptive.
|
|||
to disrupt.
|
||||
\item Parts and quits \emph{are not} proposals, \emph{unless} intended to disrupt.
|
||||
\item Special behaviour: valid votes with \texttt{:D:} or \texttt{D:} substituted for \texttt{:D}
|
||||
can \emph{not} act as proposals. These messages still filibuster.
|
||||
\emph{as well as} messages beginning with \texttt{nolog:} or \texttt{[nolog]} can \emph{not} act as
|
||||
proposals. These messages still filibuster.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -139,7 +141,7 @@ can \emph{not} act as proposals. These messages still filibuster.
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item In cases where there is disagreement on whether something passed, the
|
||||
lawrememberer's point of view is used.
|
||||
authoritative log's point of view is used.
|
||||
\item The person who opens the vote on a proposal must provide the law to lawrememberer,
|
||||
if requested to do so.
|
||||
\item Zero-width spaces in votes are to be ignored.
|
||||
|
@ -174,8 +176,8 @@ law from being passed, is known as a filibuster. This is in line with the litera
|
|||
\item \texttt{new ancient law}: A law that has always been true,
|
||||
but was only recently discovered and legislated.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \texttt{lawrememberer}: The person responsible for maintaining the lawlist,
|
||||
currently `nortti'.
|
||||
\item \texttt{lawrememberer}: The people responsible for maintaining the lawlist,
|
||||
currently `nortti', `shikhin`, and `vehk`.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \texttt{lawspeaker}: The person who interprets and clarifies the law,
|
||||
currently `nortti'.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue